SaaS Management Simplified.

Discover, Manage and Secure all your apps

Built for IT, Finance and Security Teams

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Recognized by

Turning Cost Chaos into FinOps Collaboration in a Global Bank

Originally Published:
September 11, 2025
Last Updated:
September 11, 2025
8 min

Introduction: From Bill Shock to Collaborative FinOps Discipline

As demonstrated by forward-thinking organizations and shared through the FinOps Foundation’s community stories, this case study reflects how enterprises are taming runaway cloud bills and reshaping their operating culture through FinOps cloud cost collaboration. By bridging engineering and finance with shared KPIs, teams are proving that cloud financial management is not just about cost cutting, it is about aligning technology and business for scalable, sustainable growth.  

For many global enterprises, cloud promises flexibility and scale, but it also introduces a new category of financial chaos. A leading multinational bank experienced this first-hand when an unexpected surge in cloud consumption drove operating expenses beyond forecast by double-digit percentages. What looked like a billing anomaly was a systemic lack of collaboration on FinOps cloud costs across engineering, finance, and product teams.

The friction stemmed from three issues:

  • Fragmented visibility meant finance saw costs only at quarter-end, while engineering tracked utilization metrics that never connected to business value.
  • Reactive controls focused on cutting overruns rather than preventing them, leading to cycle-after-cycle firefighting.
  • No shared accountability left costs “owned by no one,” creating mistrust between finance leaders and engineering managers.

Leadership realized that cloud financial management could no longer be treated as a back-office reporting exercise. Instead, it had to become an engineering FinOps playbook, with developers, architects, and finance leaders working from shared KPIs. This cultural reset would allow the bank to transform cloud costs from an unpredictable liability into a transparent, measurable, and trusted investment.

To address this, the organization implemented tagging discipline across workloads, mandated unit economics reporting at the product level, and established cross-functional cost councils where finance and engineering reviewed numbers side by side. It was not just a governance move; it was a signal that cloud financial accountability was now a team sport.

The transformation goals were ambitious but clear:

  • Forecast cloud costs with accuracy instead of waiting for surprises
  • Eliminate duplicated services and idle resources through joint reviews
  • Enable developer cost awareness so engineering choices always reflect business trade-offs
  • Build stakeholder alignment around cloud as a value engine, not a black-box expense

Within months, the shift was visible. Engineers began surfacing cost-saving ideas proactively, finance teams gained trust in forecasts, and business leaders finally saw a direct connection between investment in infrastructure and customer value delivered.

These are the same kinds of challenges CloudNuro.ai was designed to solve, bridging the divide between finance and engineering through real-time visibility, chargeback-ready reporting, and unit economics dashboards.

FinOps Journey: From Cost Chaos to Cloud Cost Collaboration

For the global bank, moving from reactive cost firefighting to collaborative FinOps maturity required deliberate execution. This journey unfolded in four interconnected phases, each designed to replace siloed decisions with shared accountability.

Phase 1 – Creating a Unified Cost Language

Initially, finance and engineering operated in different realities. Finance relied on invoices and spreadsheets while engineering optimized for uptime without a financial context. The breakthrough came when the bank introduced tagging standards across AWS, Azure, and SaaS services, creating a standard taxonomy aligned with products and business units.

  • Cross-team reporting dashboards gave everyone a single source of truth
  • Early anomaly detection flagged unusual spend spikes before invoices arrived
  • Guardrails for tagging compliance ensured new resources could not be provisioned without cost allocation

This alignment uncovered over $2.1M in unused compute and SaaS licenses within six months.

If your engineering dashboards and finance spreadsheets don’t tell the same story, you’re already leaking millions. See how other enterprises aligned cost language in weeks.

Phase 2 – Building Developer Cost Awareness

Shifting FinOps left meant embedding cost visibility directly into the developer workflow. The bank integrated policy-as-code guardrails into CI/CD pipelines, blocking or flagging deployments that exceeded budget thresholds. Engineers now saw the dollar impact of every design choice in real time.

  • Cost per feature release was calculated and surfaced automatically
  • Shared scorecards compared teams on efficiency KPIs, spurring healthy competition
  • Auto-remediation scripts shut down idle test environments overnight

This built trust, finance teams knew that engineers weren’t just optimizing performance but also actively contributing to financial efficiency.

Phase 3 – Establishing Cross-Functional Governance

To prevent cost chaos from returning, the bank formalized cloud cost councils where product owners, engineering leaders, and finance executives met monthly to review KPIs. This forum wasn’t about finger-pointing, it was about joint decision-making.

  • Cross-functional KPIs replaced siloed metrics
  • Quarterly cost forecasts were co-owned by engineering and finance
  • Unit economics reporting allowed leaders to track cost per transaction, per user, or per API call

Governance shifted from reactive to proactive, aligning cloud costs with business value.

Phase 4 – Operationalizing Accountability at Scale

Finally, the bank implemented chargeback and showback models at the business unit level. Costs were no longer abstract, they were directly tied to revenue-generating activities.

  • Showback reports gave business leaders visibility into consumption patterns
  • Chargeback billing assigned costs to the accountable teams, creating ownership
  • Dynamic forecasting adjusted budgets in real time as workloads fluctuated

This phase cemented the cultural change: cloud costs became not just an IT concern but a shared business responsibility.

Outcomes – The Business Impact of FinOps Cloud Cost Collaboration

The global bank’s FinOps transformation yielded measurable results that extended far beyond cost-cutting. By embedding FinOps cloud cost collaboration into everyday workflows, the institution unlocked transparency, efficiency, and trust across its finance and engineering functions.

$3.8M in Annualized Savings through Optimization

By uncovering stranded compute resources, eliminating idle storage, and rightsizing environments, the bank achieved over $3.8 million in recurring annual savings. Crucially, these savings did not compromise performance or availability. Instead, they proved that structured collaboration between finance and engineering could deliver meaningful ROI while maintaining resilience.

  • Automated anomaly detection helped catch spend spikes within hours, not months
  • Rightsizing rules reduced over-provisioned databases and instances by 27%
  • Cross-vendor license audits uncovered SaaS waste equal to $900K per year

42% Reduction in Cross-Team Budget Friction

Before adopting collaborative FinOps practices, reconciliation meetings between engineering and finance often ended in disputes. After implementing shared dashboards and FOCUS-aligned tagging, disputes dropped significantly, replaced by data-driven conversations. Finance could finally trace every dollar to a workload, while engineering could defend architecture choices with transparent numbers.

  • Monthly FinOps reviews replaced quarterly invoice disputes
  • Real-time cost mapping ensured no finger-pointing over untagged resources
  • Finance-engineering KPIs promoted shared accountability rather than siloed blame
If your budget meetings feel like arguments instead of strategy sessions, it’s time to rethink governance. See how unified dashboards transform the conversation.

Improved Forecast Accuracy by 29%

Forecasting cloud costs had previously been a guessing game, leading to underbudgeting or over-allocation. By integrating SaaS workload analytics and predictive modeling, the bank reduced variance between forecasted and actual spend by nearly 29%. It improved not only cost control but also credibility with the board.

  • Scenario planning modeled GPU spikes and storage growth with real business inputs
  • Predictive procurement avoided costly last-minute orders
  • Proactive budget reshaping aligned spending more closely with evolving business priorities

Cultural Shift: From Cost Policing to Shared Ownership

Perhaps the most transformative outcome was cultural. By embedding FinOps into engineering playbooks, costs were no longer treated as an afterthought or a compliance burden. Teams saw the direct link between their design decisions and business outcomes, shifting the culture from reactive firefighting to proactive ownership.

  • Engineering autonomy was preserved while financial guardrails ensured accountability
  • Cross-functional KPIs tied cost efficiency to delivery speed and customer value
  • Executive trust increased, enabling greater investment in innovation initiatives  

Together, these outcomes prove that FinOps cloud cost collaboration is not just about cutting spend, it’s about aligning financial and engineering priorities to drive smarter business growth.

Lessons for the Sector – Actionable Takeaways

This transformation by the global bank offers clear, replicable insights for other enterprises facing FinOps cloud cost collaboration challenges. The following lessons provide actionable guidance for CIOs, CFOs, and engineering leaders looking to mature their FinOps practices.

Adopt a Flexible but Opinionated Allocation Framework

While flexibility ensures adaptability across diverse workloads, an opinionated allocation model provides clarity and prevents endless debate. By leveraging FOCUS-aligned tagging and categorization, enterprises can strike a balance between governance and agility.

  • Establish baseline tagging rules that are non-negotiable while allowing business units to extend tags for their own reporting needs
  • Use unit economics (per feature, per product, per customer) as a guide to enforce consistency
  • Regularly audit allocation accuracy to ensure no costs are left untagged or misattributed

Shift from Showback to Chargeback with Business Buy-In

Showback provides visibility, but accountability only comes when costs are tied directly to business unit budgets. The bank’s success came from aligning finance and engineering on credible chargeback models.

  • Socialize financial dashboards early with stakeholders to build trust before enforcement
  • Start with pilot chargeback programs in select units to refine the model before scaling
  • Ensure executive sponsorship so that chargeback adoption is driven from the top down

Integrate FinOps into Planning, Not Just Operations

Reactive cost management often leads to firefighting. By embedding FinOps into the software delivery lifecycle, costs can be anticipated rather than corrected.

  • Include cost projections in CI/CD pipelines so developers see the potential impact before deployment
  • Build “policy as code” guardrails to automatically flag cost anomalies during design and testing
  • Align budget forecasts with product roadmaps to ensure financial planning reflects real demand

Track SaaS and Orphaned Licenses with the Same Rigor as Cloud

Too often, FinOps practices focus solely on infrastructure while ignoring SaaS license sprawl. In reality, collaboration and monitoring tools can generate just as much waste if unmanaged.

  • Conduct quarterly SaaS license audits to identify inactive or duplicate subscriptions
  • Apply usage thresholds to automatically deprovision unused accounts
  • Integrate SaaS metrics into FinOps dashboards for a unified cost accountability view
Cloud waste is visible, SaaS waste is silent. Run a SaaS efficiency check to see where dollars are hiding.

Align Unit Economics to Product or Engineering Teams

The most advanced organizations move beyond cost visibility into business-aligned economics. By connecting spend to customer impact or product value, costs become an enabler of smarter decisions.

  • Calculate cost per transaction, per feature, or per customer to link cloud investment to outcomes directly
  • Share unit cost metrics with product leaders to guide prioritization
  • Use trend reporting to highlight efficiency improvements over time, reinforcing the value of engineering choices

CloudNuro.ai – Powering Collaborative FinOps Maturity

The story of this global bank shows that FinOps cloud cost collaboration is not about isolated optimization, it is about alignment, accountability, and actionable data that drives better business decisions. But achieving this at scale requires more than manual dashboards and quarterly reviews.

That is where CloudNuro.ai comes in. Its platform was designed to empower CIOs, CFOs, and engineering leaders to operationalize FinOps practices with confidence:

  • Dynamic chargeback and showback models that translate consumption into trusted financial accountability
  • Cross-functional dashboards that give finance, engineering, and product teams one unified view of cloud spend
  • Automated anomaly detection and policy-driven guardrails that catch cost overruns before they spiral into chaos
  • Unit economics reporting that ties every dollar spent to customer, product, or transaction-level business impact

With these capabilities, enterprises can move past reporting into proper collaborative governance, where every stakeholder knows not only what they are spending but why it matters.

Want to see how cross-team cost alignment could change your cloud strategy? Take a guided walkthrough of CloudNuro.ai’s collaborative FinOps platform and uncover hidden efficiencies that traditional reporting cannot surface.

Driving Similar Outcomes with CloudNuro.ai

The journey of this global bank illustrates how FinOps cloud cost collaboration transforms chaos into clarity. But the same playbook is now accessible to any enterprise looking to mature its FinOps practice. CloudNuro.ai has been purpose-built to enable organizations to achieve the very same breakthroughs:

  • Unified Visibility: Bring engineering, finance, and business teams together around one set of numbers instead of debating whose dashboard is right.
  • Actionable Insights: Tie spending directly to KPIs that matter, cost per transaction, per customer, or per application.
  • Continuous Governance: Ensure compliance with financial and technical guardrails through automation rather than manual policing.

The result is more than just savings, it is a cultural shift where stakeholders stop arguing over costs and start collaborating on how to deliver greater business value.

Curious to see how these collaborative dashboards look in action? Explore a personalized CloudNuro.ai walkthrough and experience how cost governance becomes a driver of innovation.

Testimonial

Once we aligned engineering and finance around a shared cost view, the conversations changed completely. Instead of defending spending, we started planning investments with confidence. That shift unlocked real trust across the organization.

VP of Technology Finance

Global Banking Enterprise

Original Video – Cloud Cost Chaos to Collaboration

This story was initially shared with the FinOps Foundation as part of their enterprise case study series. The session highlights how a global bank moved from reactive firefighting to proactive FinOps cloud cost collaboration, setting the stage for other enterprises to follow.

Table of Content

Start saving with CloudNuro

Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment —just 15 minutes to savings!

Get Started

Table of Content

Introduction: From Bill Shock to Collaborative FinOps Discipline

As demonstrated by forward-thinking organizations and shared through the FinOps Foundation’s community stories, this case study reflects how enterprises are taming runaway cloud bills and reshaping their operating culture through FinOps cloud cost collaboration. By bridging engineering and finance with shared KPIs, teams are proving that cloud financial management is not just about cost cutting, it is about aligning technology and business for scalable, sustainable growth.  

For many global enterprises, cloud promises flexibility and scale, but it also introduces a new category of financial chaos. A leading multinational bank experienced this first-hand when an unexpected surge in cloud consumption drove operating expenses beyond forecast by double-digit percentages. What looked like a billing anomaly was a systemic lack of collaboration on FinOps cloud costs across engineering, finance, and product teams.

The friction stemmed from three issues:

  • Fragmented visibility meant finance saw costs only at quarter-end, while engineering tracked utilization metrics that never connected to business value.
  • Reactive controls focused on cutting overruns rather than preventing them, leading to cycle-after-cycle firefighting.
  • No shared accountability left costs “owned by no one,” creating mistrust between finance leaders and engineering managers.

Leadership realized that cloud financial management could no longer be treated as a back-office reporting exercise. Instead, it had to become an engineering FinOps playbook, with developers, architects, and finance leaders working from shared KPIs. This cultural reset would allow the bank to transform cloud costs from an unpredictable liability into a transparent, measurable, and trusted investment.

To address this, the organization implemented tagging discipline across workloads, mandated unit economics reporting at the product level, and established cross-functional cost councils where finance and engineering reviewed numbers side by side. It was not just a governance move; it was a signal that cloud financial accountability was now a team sport.

The transformation goals were ambitious but clear:

  • Forecast cloud costs with accuracy instead of waiting for surprises
  • Eliminate duplicated services and idle resources through joint reviews
  • Enable developer cost awareness so engineering choices always reflect business trade-offs
  • Build stakeholder alignment around cloud as a value engine, not a black-box expense

Within months, the shift was visible. Engineers began surfacing cost-saving ideas proactively, finance teams gained trust in forecasts, and business leaders finally saw a direct connection between investment in infrastructure and customer value delivered.

These are the same kinds of challenges CloudNuro.ai was designed to solve, bridging the divide between finance and engineering through real-time visibility, chargeback-ready reporting, and unit economics dashboards.

FinOps Journey: From Cost Chaos to Cloud Cost Collaboration

For the global bank, moving from reactive cost firefighting to collaborative FinOps maturity required deliberate execution. This journey unfolded in four interconnected phases, each designed to replace siloed decisions with shared accountability.

Phase 1 – Creating a Unified Cost Language

Initially, finance and engineering operated in different realities. Finance relied on invoices and spreadsheets while engineering optimized for uptime without a financial context. The breakthrough came when the bank introduced tagging standards across AWS, Azure, and SaaS services, creating a standard taxonomy aligned with products and business units.

  • Cross-team reporting dashboards gave everyone a single source of truth
  • Early anomaly detection flagged unusual spend spikes before invoices arrived
  • Guardrails for tagging compliance ensured new resources could not be provisioned without cost allocation

This alignment uncovered over $2.1M in unused compute and SaaS licenses within six months.

If your engineering dashboards and finance spreadsheets don’t tell the same story, you’re already leaking millions. See how other enterprises aligned cost language in weeks.

Phase 2 – Building Developer Cost Awareness

Shifting FinOps left meant embedding cost visibility directly into the developer workflow. The bank integrated policy-as-code guardrails into CI/CD pipelines, blocking or flagging deployments that exceeded budget thresholds. Engineers now saw the dollar impact of every design choice in real time.

  • Cost per feature release was calculated and surfaced automatically
  • Shared scorecards compared teams on efficiency KPIs, spurring healthy competition
  • Auto-remediation scripts shut down idle test environments overnight

This built trust, finance teams knew that engineers weren’t just optimizing performance but also actively contributing to financial efficiency.

Phase 3 – Establishing Cross-Functional Governance

To prevent cost chaos from returning, the bank formalized cloud cost councils where product owners, engineering leaders, and finance executives met monthly to review KPIs. This forum wasn’t about finger-pointing, it was about joint decision-making.

  • Cross-functional KPIs replaced siloed metrics
  • Quarterly cost forecasts were co-owned by engineering and finance
  • Unit economics reporting allowed leaders to track cost per transaction, per user, or per API call

Governance shifted from reactive to proactive, aligning cloud costs with business value.

Phase 4 – Operationalizing Accountability at Scale

Finally, the bank implemented chargeback and showback models at the business unit level. Costs were no longer abstract, they were directly tied to revenue-generating activities.

  • Showback reports gave business leaders visibility into consumption patterns
  • Chargeback billing assigned costs to the accountable teams, creating ownership
  • Dynamic forecasting adjusted budgets in real time as workloads fluctuated

This phase cemented the cultural change: cloud costs became not just an IT concern but a shared business responsibility.

Outcomes – The Business Impact of FinOps Cloud Cost Collaboration

The global bank’s FinOps transformation yielded measurable results that extended far beyond cost-cutting. By embedding FinOps cloud cost collaboration into everyday workflows, the institution unlocked transparency, efficiency, and trust across its finance and engineering functions.

$3.8M in Annualized Savings through Optimization

By uncovering stranded compute resources, eliminating idle storage, and rightsizing environments, the bank achieved over $3.8 million in recurring annual savings. Crucially, these savings did not compromise performance or availability. Instead, they proved that structured collaboration between finance and engineering could deliver meaningful ROI while maintaining resilience.

  • Automated anomaly detection helped catch spend spikes within hours, not months
  • Rightsizing rules reduced over-provisioned databases and instances by 27%
  • Cross-vendor license audits uncovered SaaS waste equal to $900K per year

42% Reduction in Cross-Team Budget Friction

Before adopting collaborative FinOps practices, reconciliation meetings between engineering and finance often ended in disputes. After implementing shared dashboards and FOCUS-aligned tagging, disputes dropped significantly, replaced by data-driven conversations. Finance could finally trace every dollar to a workload, while engineering could defend architecture choices with transparent numbers.

  • Monthly FinOps reviews replaced quarterly invoice disputes
  • Real-time cost mapping ensured no finger-pointing over untagged resources
  • Finance-engineering KPIs promoted shared accountability rather than siloed blame
If your budget meetings feel like arguments instead of strategy sessions, it’s time to rethink governance. See how unified dashboards transform the conversation.

Improved Forecast Accuracy by 29%

Forecasting cloud costs had previously been a guessing game, leading to underbudgeting or over-allocation. By integrating SaaS workload analytics and predictive modeling, the bank reduced variance between forecasted and actual spend by nearly 29%. It improved not only cost control but also credibility with the board.

  • Scenario planning modeled GPU spikes and storage growth with real business inputs
  • Predictive procurement avoided costly last-minute orders
  • Proactive budget reshaping aligned spending more closely with evolving business priorities

Cultural Shift: From Cost Policing to Shared Ownership

Perhaps the most transformative outcome was cultural. By embedding FinOps into engineering playbooks, costs were no longer treated as an afterthought or a compliance burden. Teams saw the direct link between their design decisions and business outcomes, shifting the culture from reactive firefighting to proactive ownership.

  • Engineering autonomy was preserved while financial guardrails ensured accountability
  • Cross-functional KPIs tied cost efficiency to delivery speed and customer value
  • Executive trust increased, enabling greater investment in innovation initiatives  

Together, these outcomes prove that FinOps cloud cost collaboration is not just about cutting spend, it’s about aligning financial and engineering priorities to drive smarter business growth.

Lessons for the Sector – Actionable Takeaways

This transformation by the global bank offers clear, replicable insights for other enterprises facing FinOps cloud cost collaboration challenges. The following lessons provide actionable guidance for CIOs, CFOs, and engineering leaders looking to mature their FinOps practices.

Adopt a Flexible but Opinionated Allocation Framework

While flexibility ensures adaptability across diverse workloads, an opinionated allocation model provides clarity and prevents endless debate. By leveraging FOCUS-aligned tagging and categorization, enterprises can strike a balance between governance and agility.

  • Establish baseline tagging rules that are non-negotiable while allowing business units to extend tags for their own reporting needs
  • Use unit economics (per feature, per product, per customer) as a guide to enforce consistency
  • Regularly audit allocation accuracy to ensure no costs are left untagged or misattributed

Shift from Showback to Chargeback with Business Buy-In

Showback provides visibility, but accountability only comes when costs are tied directly to business unit budgets. The bank’s success came from aligning finance and engineering on credible chargeback models.

  • Socialize financial dashboards early with stakeholders to build trust before enforcement
  • Start with pilot chargeback programs in select units to refine the model before scaling
  • Ensure executive sponsorship so that chargeback adoption is driven from the top down

Integrate FinOps into Planning, Not Just Operations

Reactive cost management often leads to firefighting. By embedding FinOps into the software delivery lifecycle, costs can be anticipated rather than corrected.

  • Include cost projections in CI/CD pipelines so developers see the potential impact before deployment
  • Build “policy as code” guardrails to automatically flag cost anomalies during design and testing
  • Align budget forecasts with product roadmaps to ensure financial planning reflects real demand

Track SaaS and Orphaned Licenses with the Same Rigor as Cloud

Too often, FinOps practices focus solely on infrastructure while ignoring SaaS license sprawl. In reality, collaboration and monitoring tools can generate just as much waste if unmanaged.

  • Conduct quarterly SaaS license audits to identify inactive or duplicate subscriptions
  • Apply usage thresholds to automatically deprovision unused accounts
  • Integrate SaaS metrics into FinOps dashboards for a unified cost accountability view
Cloud waste is visible, SaaS waste is silent. Run a SaaS efficiency check to see where dollars are hiding.

Align Unit Economics to Product or Engineering Teams

The most advanced organizations move beyond cost visibility into business-aligned economics. By connecting spend to customer impact or product value, costs become an enabler of smarter decisions.

  • Calculate cost per transaction, per feature, or per customer to link cloud investment to outcomes directly
  • Share unit cost metrics with product leaders to guide prioritization
  • Use trend reporting to highlight efficiency improvements over time, reinforcing the value of engineering choices

CloudNuro.ai – Powering Collaborative FinOps Maturity

The story of this global bank shows that FinOps cloud cost collaboration is not about isolated optimization, it is about alignment, accountability, and actionable data that drives better business decisions. But achieving this at scale requires more than manual dashboards and quarterly reviews.

That is where CloudNuro.ai comes in. Its platform was designed to empower CIOs, CFOs, and engineering leaders to operationalize FinOps practices with confidence:

  • Dynamic chargeback and showback models that translate consumption into trusted financial accountability
  • Cross-functional dashboards that give finance, engineering, and product teams one unified view of cloud spend
  • Automated anomaly detection and policy-driven guardrails that catch cost overruns before they spiral into chaos
  • Unit economics reporting that ties every dollar spent to customer, product, or transaction-level business impact

With these capabilities, enterprises can move past reporting into proper collaborative governance, where every stakeholder knows not only what they are spending but why it matters.

Want to see how cross-team cost alignment could change your cloud strategy? Take a guided walkthrough of CloudNuro.ai’s collaborative FinOps platform and uncover hidden efficiencies that traditional reporting cannot surface.

Driving Similar Outcomes with CloudNuro.ai

The journey of this global bank illustrates how FinOps cloud cost collaboration transforms chaos into clarity. But the same playbook is now accessible to any enterprise looking to mature its FinOps practice. CloudNuro.ai has been purpose-built to enable organizations to achieve the very same breakthroughs:

  • Unified Visibility: Bring engineering, finance, and business teams together around one set of numbers instead of debating whose dashboard is right.
  • Actionable Insights: Tie spending directly to KPIs that matter, cost per transaction, per customer, or per application.
  • Continuous Governance: Ensure compliance with financial and technical guardrails through automation rather than manual policing.

The result is more than just savings, it is a cultural shift where stakeholders stop arguing over costs and start collaborating on how to deliver greater business value.

Curious to see how these collaborative dashboards look in action? Explore a personalized CloudNuro.ai walkthrough and experience how cost governance becomes a driver of innovation.

Testimonial

Once we aligned engineering and finance around a shared cost view, the conversations changed completely. Instead of defending spending, we started planning investments with confidence. That shift unlocked real trust across the organization.

VP of Technology Finance

Global Banking Enterprise

Original Video – Cloud Cost Chaos to Collaboration

This story was initially shared with the FinOps Foundation as part of their enterprise case study series. The session highlights how a global bank moved from reactive firefighting to proactive FinOps cloud cost collaboration, setting the stage for other enterprises to follow.

Start saving with CloudNuro

Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment —just 15 minutes to savings!

Get Started

Save 20% of your SaaS spends with CloudNuro.ai

Recognized Leader in SaaS Management Platforms by Info-Tech SoftwareReviews

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.