

Book a Demo
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
As demonstrated by forward-thinking organizations and shared through the FinOps Foundation’s community stories, this case reflects practical strategies enterprises are using to reclaim control over cloud and SaaS spend.
In the fast-moving world of autonomous technology, innovation isn’t just a goal; it’s a survival requirement. For one global autonomous technology enterprise, speed meant everything: running millions of simulations, training machine learning models, and processing vast datasets every week. These workloads demanded heavy compute, GPU acceleration, and elastic scalability, all orchestrated on Kubernetes.
But speed came at a cost, literally. While their AWS environment was carefully tagged for accountability, Kubernetes clusters were a different story. Multiple teams ran workloads on shared clusters, costs were pooled together, and invoices showed large, unattributed numbers. Finance leaders faced the uncomfortable reality of a black hole consuming a significant portion of the cloud bill.
Without knowing who was using what, and for how long, critical FinOps capabilities were blocked:
The leadership team recognized the urgency. They needed FinOps Kubernetes chargeback capabilities that could:
After evaluating vendor solutions and cloud native tools, they realized that AWS’s native cost allocation for Kubernetes was still emerging. Open-source options like Kubecost were promising, but didn’t fit their tech stack. The company had deep Kubernetes expertise in-house, so the decision was made: build a tailored, scalable, and near-real-time chargeback system.
Their transformation wasn’t just about technology. It was about shifting the culture from a mindset where Kubernetes was a “free shared resource” to one where engineering teams owned their consumption and costs. This journey not only solved the attribution challenge but also unlocked new possibilities for budgeting, anomaly detection, and optimization.
These are the exact types of problems CloudNuro.ai was built to solve across both cloud and SaaS platforms, enabling IT finance leaders to transform spend visibility into actionable accountability.
Phase 1 - Establish Cost Attribution Prerequisites
The enterprise began by tackling the most fundamental FinOps principle: accurate attribution starts with consistent tagging and labeling. While AWS resources had long been tagged with project and owner metadata, Kubernetes workloads lacked the same rigor.
Key steps:
This discipline served two purposes:
Lesson from this phase: Without enforced labeling, chargeback becomes guesswork. This mirrors how CloudNuro.ai helps customers unify tagging and labeling across both SaaS and multi-cloud environments to ensure that every dollar spent can be traced back to its business purpose.
Phase 2 - Build the Measurement Layer
With attribution groundwork in place, the next step was building the “pod cost meter”. The goal: measure pod activity over time, translate it into dollars, and store it for analysis.
Tools and architecture:
Why build, not buy?
By persisting pod event data indefinitely (instead of Kubernetes' short-term etcd storage), the company created a permanent audit trail of workload activity. This approach mirrors how CloudNuro.ai captures and normalizes SaaS and cloud usage data for historical and predictive analysis.
Phase 3 - Deliver Showback and Chargeback
Measurement without action is just reporting. The final phase focused on turning data into accountability.
PodCost ETL Job:
Dashboards and Integrations:
This shift brought immediate cultural changes:
This level of insight is exactly what CloudNuro.ai delivers to IT finance leaders, empowering them to move from cloud cost visibility to ownership and continuous optimization.
1. >$3M/year in previously hidden costs identified and attributed
Before this initiative, Kubernetes costs were effectively invisible in the enterprise’s financial reports. Half the cloud bill showed up as a single, unattributed line item, making cost accountability impossible. Once PodWatcher and PodCost were in place, every pod was tied to an owner, project, and workload.
When rolled up, the results were staggering. Over $3 million annually in previously hidden expenses was suddenly mapped to specific teams. This wasn’t theoretical math; it was hard, audit-ready data. Finance could now pinpoint exactly which workloads were driving spend spikes, which projects consumed the most GPU hours, and where idle or oversized resources were silently inflating bills.
This shift didn’t just illuminate the problem; it redefined cloud governance. Leadership could have frank, data-backed discussions with engineering managers, and optimization efforts became targeted instead of guesswork. This mirrors the kind of cost allocation precision CloudNuro.ai delivers, enabling organizations to surface hidden costs in both cloud and SaaS platforms.
2. 26% reduction in cross-team spend friction
Shared clusters had always been a source of subtle tension. Engineering teams suspected others were over-consuming resources, but without data, it was just speculation. Finance often found itself caught between teams, trying to reconcile vague cost reports and competing budget claims.
Once the Kubernetes chargeback was implemented, cost conversations became data-driven and transparent. Every team could see its exact consumption in dashboards and compare it against others. This eliminated the “finger-pointing” dynamic and replaced it with shared responsibility for efficiency.
Within months, the company recorded a 26% drop in cross-team disputes over Kubernetes spend. Instead of debating who was responsible, teams collaborated to optimize workloads, reduce idle capacity, and share best practices for resource requests.
By making cost data visible, the platform team shifted the culture from reactive blame to proactive optimization. This is precisely the type of accountability culture CloudNuro.ai enables, by giving all stakeholders a single source of truth for spend attribution.
3. Faster budget cycles and better forecasting
Before the transformation, Kubernetes spending was unpredictable. Without granular attribution, finance teams struggled to forecast costs for upcoming projects or allocate budgets accurately. As a result, budget cycles dragged on, with large “buffer allocations” baked in to account for uncertainty.
With pod-level cost data feeding directly into AWS billing and internal finance systems, forecasting became dramatically more accurate. Teams could model future spend by simulating workload changes, for example, predicting the impact of doubling simulation runs or migrating a training job to a different instance type.
Budget cycles were shortened, and finance could confidently align spend forecasts with engineering roadmaps. This reduced the need for oversized contingency funds, freeing up budget for innovation.
In effect, the enterprise moved from reactive cost control to predictive cost planning, a shift that aligns perfectly with FinOps maturity best practices. CloudNuro.ai customers see similar transformations, using unified cloud + SaaS spend data to model and optimize budgets before costs are incurred.
Adopt a flexible but opinionated allocation framework
Kubernetes cost allocation isn’t a one-size-fits-all problem. This enterprise succeeded because it adopted a flexible model that could evolve with its workloads but still enforced strong policies. They required labels for every pod, standardized resource requests, and mandated alignment with AWS tagging conventions.
This approach ensured both technical accuracy (clean, reliable data) and organizational alignment (teams understood and accepted the rules). The lesson for other enterprises: flexibility without structure leads to chaos, but structure without flexibility leads to resistance.
CloudNuro.ai supports this balance by letting organizations configure allocation policies to match their culture while providing opinionated defaults aligned to FinOps standards like FOCUS. This ensures faster adoption and cleaner data from day one.
Key Points:
Shift from showback to chargeback with business buy-in
Showback giving teams visibility into their costs is an essential first step, but without chargeback, accountability is limited. This enterprise made the cultural shift by starting with showback dashboards, socializing the data, and building trust in its accuracy.
Once stakeholders were confident, they introduced proportional cost recovery (chargeback). Because the process was transparent and data quality was high, business units accepted the shift with minimal friction. This prevented the standard “surprise bill” backlash that derails chargeback initiatives.
CloudNuro.ai helps organizations take the same approach, with features to roll out showback first, validate accuracy, then transition to full chargeback when stakeholders are ready.
Key Points:
Integrate FinOps into planning, not just operations
Many FinOps efforts get stuck in a reactive loop, analyzing past spend rather than influencing future costs. This enterprise broke that pattern by integrating cost insights into project planning.
For example, before a major simulation campaign, teams could estimate pod-level costs using historical data and make trade-offs between accuracy, runtime, and budget. This turned cost optimization into a design-time decision, not an afterthought.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai enables this forward-looking approach by combining historical spend data with predictive analytics. This ensures cost considerations are part of architecture reviews, sprint planning, and product roadmap discussions where they have the most impact.
Track unused and orphaned SaaS licenses as rigorously as cloud waste
While Kubernetes waste was the original target, the same FinOps mindset applied to SaaS. This enterprise realized that unused SaaS licenses and orphaned accounts were another form of hidden cost. By extending tagging and ownership policies to SaaS apps, they began reclaiming thousands in unnecessary spend each quarter.
The key lesson: waste is waste, whether it’s in Kubernetes nodes or underused SaaS subscriptions. A unified visibility and chargeback model creates accountability across all technology spend categories.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai’s platform is built for this, giving equal visibility to cloud resources, Kubernetes pods, and SaaS license utilization, all under one cost accountability framework.
Align unit economics to product or engineering teams
Ultimately, cost accountability works best when it’s aligned with business outcomes. This enterprise rolled up pod-level data into workload and product-level views, mapping spend directly to engineering deliverables.
This meant teams didn’t just see “you spent $50,000 on Kubernetes last month,” they saw “feature X consumed $18,000 in simulation costs.” This reframed the conversation from cost policing to value delivery, allowing leadership to weigh spend against ROI.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai supports this by letting organizations define cost allocation hierarchies that map technical spend to business metrics, enabling true unit economics visibility.
The journey of this global autonomous technology enterprise is a textbook example of how Kubernetes cost visibility transforms from a technical challenge into a business enabler. By moving from opaque, shared cluster bills to precise, workload-level attribution, they unlocked millions in hidden costs, reduced cross-team friction, and made budgeting a strategic advantage.
This is precisely what CloudNuro.ai delivers out of the box without requiring years of in-house engineering effort.
Key CloudNuro capabilities for Kubernetes FinOps chargeback:
Whether your organization is in the early stages of FinOps maturity or looking to optimize a mature practice, CloudNuro.ai provides the technical foundation and operational playbooks to operationalize cost accountability at scale.
Want to replicate this transformation? Book a free FinOps insights demo with CloudNuro.ai to:
This story was initially shared with the FinOps Foundation as part of their enterprise case study series.
Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment —just 15 minutes to savings!
Get StartedAs demonstrated by forward-thinking organizations and shared through the FinOps Foundation’s community stories, this case reflects practical strategies enterprises are using to reclaim control over cloud and SaaS spend.
In the fast-moving world of autonomous technology, innovation isn’t just a goal; it’s a survival requirement. For one global autonomous technology enterprise, speed meant everything: running millions of simulations, training machine learning models, and processing vast datasets every week. These workloads demanded heavy compute, GPU acceleration, and elastic scalability, all orchestrated on Kubernetes.
But speed came at a cost, literally. While their AWS environment was carefully tagged for accountability, Kubernetes clusters were a different story. Multiple teams ran workloads on shared clusters, costs were pooled together, and invoices showed large, unattributed numbers. Finance leaders faced the uncomfortable reality of a black hole consuming a significant portion of the cloud bill.
Without knowing who was using what, and for how long, critical FinOps capabilities were blocked:
The leadership team recognized the urgency. They needed FinOps Kubernetes chargeback capabilities that could:
After evaluating vendor solutions and cloud native tools, they realized that AWS’s native cost allocation for Kubernetes was still emerging. Open-source options like Kubecost were promising, but didn’t fit their tech stack. The company had deep Kubernetes expertise in-house, so the decision was made: build a tailored, scalable, and near-real-time chargeback system.
Their transformation wasn’t just about technology. It was about shifting the culture from a mindset where Kubernetes was a “free shared resource” to one where engineering teams owned their consumption and costs. This journey not only solved the attribution challenge but also unlocked new possibilities for budgeting, anomaly detection, and optimization.
These are the exact types of problems CloudNuro.ai was built to solve across both cloud and SaaS platforms, enabling IT finance leaders to transform spend visibility into actionable accountability.
Phase 1 - Establish Cost Attribution Prerequisites
The enterprise began by tackling the most fundamental FinOps principle: accurate attribution starts with consistent tagging and labeling. While AWS resources had long been tagged with project and owner metadata, Kubernetes workloads lacked the same rigor.
Key steps:
This discipline served two purposes:
Lesson from this phase: Without enforced labeling, chargeback becomes guesswork. This mirrors how CloudNuro.ai helps customers unify tagging and labeling across both SaaS and multi-cloud environments to ensure that every dollar spent can be traced back to its business purpose.
Phase 2 - Build the Measurement Layer
With attribution groundwork in place, the next step was building the “pod cost meter”. The goal: measure pod activity over time, translate it into dollars, and store it for analysis.
Tools and architecture:
Why build, not buy?
By persisting pod event data indefinitely (instead of Kubernetes' short-term etcd storage), the company created a permanent audit trail of workload activity. This approach mirrors how CloudNuro.ai captures and normalizes SaaS and cloud usage data for historical and predictive analysis.
Phase 3 - Deliver Showback and Chargeback
Measurement without action is just reporting. The final phase focused on turning data into accountability.
PodCost ETL Job:
Dashboards and Integrations:
This shift brought immediate cultural changes:
This level of insight is exactly what CloudNuro.ai delivers to IT finance leaders, empowering them to move from cloud cost visibility to ownership and continuous optimization.
1. >$3M/year in previously hidden costs identified and attributed
Before this initiative, Kubernetes costs were effectively invisible in the enterprise’s financial reports. Half the cloud bill showed up as a single, unattributed line item, making cost accountability impossible. Once PodWatcher and PodCost were in place, every pod was tied to an owner, project, and workload.
When rolled up, the results were staggering. Over $3 million annually in previously hidden expenses was suddenly mapped to specific teams. This wasn’t theoretical math; it was hard, audit-ready data. Finance could now pinpoint exactly which workloads were driving spend spikes, which projects consumed the most GPU hours, and where idle or oversized resources were silently inflating bills.
This shift didn’t just illuminate the problem; it redefined cloud governance. Leadership could have frank, data-backed discussions with engineering managers, and optimization efforts became targeted instead of guesswork. This mirrors the kind of cost allocation precision CloudNuro.ai delivers, enabling organizations to surface hidden costs in both cloud and SaaS platforms.
2. 26% reduction in cross-team spend friction
Shared clusters had always been a source of subtle tension. Engineering teams suspected others were over-consuming resources, but without data, it was just speculation. Finance often found itself caught between teams, trying to reconcile vague cost reports and competing budget claims.
Once the Kubernetes chargeback was implemented, cost conversations became data-driven and transparent. Every team could see its exact consumption in dashboards and compare it against others. This eliminated the “finger-pointing” dynamic and replaced it with shared responsibility for efficiency.
Within months, the company recorded a 26% drop in cross-team disputes over Kubernetes spend. Instead of debating who was responsible, teams collaborated to optimize workloads, reduce idle capacity, and share best practices for resource requests.
By making cost data visible, the platform team shifted the culture from reactive blame to proactive optimization. This is precisely the type of accountability culture CloudNuro.ai enables, by giving all stakeholders a single source of truth for spend attribution.
3. Faster budget cycles and better forecasting
Before the transformation, Kubernetes spending was unpredictable. Without granular attribution, finance teams struggled to forecast costs for upcoming projects or allocate budgets accurately. As a result, budget cycles dragged on, with large “buffer allocations” baked in to account for uncertainty.
With pod-level cost data feeding directly into AWS billing and internal finance systems, forecasting became dramatically more accurate. Teams could model future spend by simulating workload changes, for example, predicting the impact of doubling simulation runs or migrating a training job to a different instance type.
Budget cycles were shortened, and finance could confidently align spend forecasts with engineering roadmaps. This reduced the need for oversized contingency funds, freeing up budget for innovation.
In effect, the enterprise moved from reactive cost control to predictive cost planning, a shift that aligns perfectly with FinOps maturity best practices. CloudNuro.ai customers see similar transformations, using unified cloud + SaaS spend data to model and optimize budgets before costs are incurred.
Adopt a flexible but opinionated allocation framework
Kubernetes cost allocation isn’t a one-size-fits-all problem. This enterprise succeeded because it adopted a flexible model that could evolve with its workloads but still enforced strong policies. They required labels for every pod, standardized resource requests, and mandated alignment with AWS tagging conventions.
This approach ensured both technical accuracy (clean, reliable data) and organizational alignment (teams understood and accepted the rules). The lesson for other enterprises: flexibility without structure leads to chaos, but structure without flexibility leads to resistance.
CloudNuro.ai supports this balance by letting organizations configure allocation policies to match their culture while providing opinionated defaults aligned to FinOps standards like FOCUS. This ensures faster adoption and cleaner data from day one.
Key Points:
Shift from showback to chargeback with business buy-in
Showback giving teams visibility into their costs is an essential first step, but without chargeback, accountability is limited. This enterprise made the cultural shift by starting with showback dashboards, socializing the data, and building trust in its accuracy.
Once stakeholders were confident, they introduced proportional cost recovery (chargeback). Because the process was transparent and data quality was high, business units accepted the shift with minimal friction. This prevented the standard “surprise bill” backlash that derails chargeback initiatives.
CloudNuro.ai helps organizations take the same approach, with features to roll out showback first, validate accuracy, then transition to full chargeback when stakeholders are ready.
Key Points:
Integrate FinOps into planning, not just operations
Many FinOps efforts get stuck in a reactive loop, analyzing past spend rather than influencing future costs. This enterprise broke that pattern by integrating cost insights into project planning.
For example, before a major simulation campaign, teams could estimate pod-level costs using historical data and make trade-offs between accuracy, runtime, and budget. This turned cost optimization into a design-time decision, not an afterthought.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai enables this forward-looking approach by combining historical spend data with predictive analytics. This ensures cost considerations are part of architecture reviews, sprint planning, and product roadmap discussions where they have the most impact.
Track unused and orphaned SaaS licenses as rigorously as cloud waste
While Kubernetes waste was the original target, the same FinOps mindset applied to SaaS. This enterprise realized that unused SaaS licenses and orphaned accounts were another form of hidden cost. By extending tagging and ownership policies to SaaS apps, they began reclaiming thousands in unnecessary spend each quarter.
The key lesson: waste is waste, whether it’s in Kubernetes nodes or underused SaaS subscriptions. A unified visibility and chargeback model creates accountability across all technology spend categories.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai’s platform is built for this, giving equal visibility to cloud resources, Kubernetes pods, and SaaS license utilization, all under one cost accountability framework.
Align unit economics to product or engineering teams
Ultimately, cost accountability works best when it’s aligned with business outcomes. This enterprise rolled up pod-level data into workload and product-level views, mapping spend directly to engineering deliverables.
This meant teams didn’t just see “you spent $50,000 on Kubernetes last month,” they saw “feature X consumed $18,000 in simulation costs.” This reframed the conversation from cost policing to value delivery, allowing leadership to weigh spend against ROI.
Key Points:
CloudNuro.ai supports this by letting organizations define cost allocation hierarchies that map technical spend to business metrics, enabling true unit economics visibility.
The journey of this global autonomous technology enterprise is a textbook example of how Kubernetes cost visibility transforms from a technical challenge into a business enabler. By moving from opaque, shared cluster bills to precise, workload-level attribution, they unlocked millions in hidden costs, reduced cross-team friction, and made budgeting a strategic advantage.
This is precisely what CloudNuro.ai delivers out of the box without requiring years of in-house engineering effort.
Key CloudNuro capabilities for Kubernetes FinOps chargeback:
Whether your organization is in the early stages of FinOps maturity or looking to optimize a mature practice, CloudNuro.ai provides the technical foundation and operational playbooks to operationalize cost accountability at scale.
Want to replicate this transformation? Book a free FinOps insights demo with CloudNuro.ai to:
This story was initially shared with the FinOps Foundation as part of their enterprise case study series.
Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment —just 15 minutes to savings!
Get StartedRecognized Leader in SaaS Management Platforms by Info-Tech SoftwareReviews