

Sign Up
What is best time for the call?
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.



Figma has evolved from a niche UX design tool into a complete digital collaboration platform that supports design systems, prototyping, research workflows, engineering handoffs, and cross-functional ideation. As adoption increases, Figma licensing becomes more complex and expensive, particularly for organizations that fail to track actual usage patterns. Many companies purchase licenses based solely on team input, without evaluating how frequently users interact with files, the actions they perform, or whether they genuinely require full Editor permissions. This leads to widespread overspending that remains invisible until renewal deadlines.
Most companies over-assign Editor licenses because they assume editors are the only way to collaborate effectively. The truth is that a large portion of employees only need Viewer or Commenter-level access. Product managers, QA, engineering, business stakeholders, customer success, and marketing teams typically view designs, leave comments, or inspect components. These actions do not require full editing capability.
This gap between perceived need and actual usage creates large financial waste. CloudNuro’s data shows that on average:
Choosing the right plan is also critical, as access varies depending on the plan selected. Seats give access to Figma products including FigJam, Figma Slides, Dev Mode, Figma Design, Figma Draw, Figma Buzz, Figma Sites, and Figma Make.
This blog provides a complete, practical, and detailed framework for optimizing Figma licenses without slowing down collaboration or product delivery. You will learn how to analyze real usage, rightsize seat types, prevent accidental upgrades, enforce role governance, and reduce licenses across product, design, and engineering teams.
CloudNuro gives IT teams a fast path to value. Book a 15-minute setup and achieve measurable results in under 24 hours. Request a demo
Figma’s license structure is simple at first glance, but behaves differently when deployed at scale. To optimize licensing, you must understand each user type and what they actually need.
Figma offers four primary roles.
Best for: Engineering teams, project managers, leadership teams, QA, customer success, and marketing reviewers.
Best for: Contractors, vendors, and external agencies.
Best for: Designers, design system maintainers, product design leads.
Best for: IT admins, design operations, and procurement managers.
Most teams mistakenly assume that users require an Editor seat simply because they collaborate. In reality, only a small percentage of users create or modify designs. The rest can continue operating with Viewer seats without disruption. This mismatch is the foundation of Figma overspend.
Before optimizing licenses, you must understand how people actually use Figma.
To justify an Editor seat, a user must regularly use editing feature sets such as:
If a user only views files, leaves comments, downloads assets, or inspects developer specs, they do not need Editor access.
An Editor can be safely downgraded to a Viewer if they meet one or more of the following conditions.
A global SaaS company with 400 Editor seats downgraded 180 users after a CloudNuro optimization report, saving over 200,000 USD annually.
Guests are often added to Figma projects for temporary collaboration. Over time, they become forgotten and continue holding paid seats.
Many organizations reclaim 5 to 10 percent of total license costs through guest audits alone.
A lack of governance is the number one reason companies overspend on Figma licenses.
Governance prevents uncontrolled Editor seat inflation and improves audit visibility.
Optimizing Figma licenses requires mapping roles to real responsibilities.
Designers require Editor seats, including product designers, UI designers, UX designers, interaction designers, motion designers, and design system owners.
Engineers rarely need Editor seats. Viewer or Viewer Restricted access is sufficient.
Product managers typically need Viewer access to review flows, leave comments, and attend critiques.
Marketing teams primarily view brand assets and prototypes and should use Viewer seats.
Viewer seats are ideal for reviewing flows and testing prototypes.
Leadership teams primarily review designs and should use Viewer roles.
Design tools are often overlooked during offboarding, leaving orphaned seats active.
Organizations typically reclaim 10 to 18 percent of seats by fixing offboarding gaps.
Reduce parallel design systems to minimize Editor requirements.
Eliminate duplicate components that require ongoing maintenance.
Prevents accidental edits and unwanted Editor upgrades.
Organizations reduce unexpected license growth by 15 to 25 percent.
These actions reduce Figma license spend by 25 to 45 percent.
Figma’s collaborative nature makes it easy to overspend unintentionally. By analyzing actual usage, right-sizing licenses, removing inactive users, enforcing governance, and introducing structured workflows, organizations can significantly reduce costs without slowing delivery.
CloudNuro automates this process and provides deep visibility into role assignment, user behavior, spend trends, and optimization opportunities. With CloudNuro, teams can renew Figma contracts confidently with the correct seat counts.
Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment —just 15 minutes to savings!
Get StartedFigma has evolved from a niche UX design tool into a complete digital collaboration platform that supports design systems, prototyping, research workflows, engineering handoffs, and cross-functional ideation. As adoption increases, Figma licensing becomes more complex and expensive, particularly for organizations that fail to track actual usage patterns. Many companies purchase licenses based solely on team input, without evaluating how frequently users interact with files, the actions they perform, or whether they genuinely require full Editor permissions. This leads to widespread overspending that remains invisible until renewal deadlines.
Most companies over-assign Editor licenses because they assume editors are the only way to collaborate effectively. The truth is that a large portion of employees only need Viewer or Commenter-level access. Product managers, QA, engineering, business stakeholders, customer success, and marketing teams typically view designs, leave comments, or inspect components. These actions do not require full editing capability.
This gap between perceived need and actual usage creates large financial waste. CloudNuro’s data shows that on average:
Choosing the right plan is also critical, as access varies depending on the plan selected. Seats give access to Figma products including FigJam, Figma Slides, Dev Mode, Figma Design, Figma Draw, Figma Buzz, Figma Sites, and Figma Make.
This blog provides a complete, practical, and detailed framework for optimizing Figma licenses without slowing down collaboration or product delivery. You will learn how to analyze real usage, rightsize seat types, prevent accidental upgrades, enforce role governance, and reduce licenses across product, design, and engineering teams.
CloudNuro gives IT teams a fast path to value. Book a 15-minute setup and achieve measurable results in under 24 hours. Request a demo
Figma’s license structure is simple at first glance, but behaves differently when deployed at scale. To optimize licensing, you must understand each user type and what they actually need.
Figma offers four primary roles.
Best for: Engineering teams, project managers, leadership teams, QA, customer success, and marketing reviewers.
Best for: Contractors, vendors, and external agencies.
Best for: Designers, design system maintainers, product design leads.
Best for: IT admins, design operations, and procurement managers.
Most teams mistakenly assume that users require an Editor seat simply because they collaborate. In reality, only a small percentage of users create or modify designs. The rest can continue operating with Viewer seats without disruption. This mismatch is the foundation of Figma overspend.
Before optimizing licenses, you must understand how people actually use Figma.
To justify an Editor seat, a user must regularly use editing feature sets such as:
If a user only views files, leaves comments, downloads assets, or inspects developer specs, they do not need Editor access.
An Editor can be safely downgraded to a Viewer if they meet one or more of the following conditions.
A global SaaS company with 400 Editor seats downgraded 180 users after a CloudNuro optimization report, saving over 200,000 USD annually.
Guests are often added to Figma projects for temporary collaboration. Over time, they become forgotten and continue holding paid seats.
Many organizations reclaim 5 to 10 percent of total license costs through guest audits alone.
A lack of governance is the number one reason companies overspend on Figma licenses.
Governance prevents uncontrolled Editor seat inflation and improves audit visibility.
Optimizing Figma licenses requires mapping roles to real responsibilities.
Designers require Editor seats, including product designers, UI designers, UX designers, interaction designers, motion designers, and design system owners.
Engineers rarely need Editor seats. Viewer or Viewer Restricted access is sufficient.
Product managers typically need Viewer access to review flows, leave comments, and attend critiques.
Marketing teams primarily view brand assets and prototypes and should use Viewer seats.
Viewer seats are ideal for reviewing flows and testing prototypes.
Leadership teams primarily review designs and should use Viewer roles.
Design tools are often overlooked during offboarding, leaving orphaned seats active.
Organizations typically reclaim 10 to 18 percent of seats by fixing offboarding gaps.
Reduce parallel design systems to minimize Editor requirements.
Eliminate duplicate components that require ongoing maintenance.
Prevents accidental edits and unwanted Editor upgrades.
Organizations reduce unexpected license growth by 15 to 25 percent.
These actions reduce Figma license spend by 25 to 45 percent.
Figma’s collaborative nature makes it easy to overspend unintentionally. By analyzing actual usage, right-sizing licenses, removing inactive users, enforcing governance, and introducing structured workflows, organizations can significantly reduce costs without slowing delivery.
CloudNuro automates this process and provides deep visibility into role assignment, user behavior, spend trends, and optimization opportunities. With CloudNuro, teams can renew Figma contracts confidently with the correct seat counts.
Request a no cost, no obligation free assessment - just 15 minutes to savings!
Get StartedWe're offering complimentary ServiceNow license assessments to only 25 enterprises this quarter who want to unlock immediate savings without disrupting operations.
Get Free AssessmentGet StartedCloudNuro Corp
1755 Park St. Suite 207
Naperville, IL 60563
Phone : +1-630-277-9470
Email: info@cloudnuro.com


Recognized Leader in SaaS Management Platforms by Info-Tech SoftwareReviews
